|
Electronics tech Anything to do with the electronics in a model. Lights, Radio, ESC, Servo, Basic electrical. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: DX10 or MC20
I'd have to say that the model match is a major plus! I have 3 models on at the same time regularly using just the DX18.
The DX9, had it been released a few yrs sooner would probably be all the radio I would ever need, but I have the DX18.
__________________
Sharing knowledge is one thing that defies basic arithmetic logic --- the more you share, the more you get! Joe |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: DX10 or MC20
Quote:
Is the Spektrum really my only option for what I want? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DX10 or MC20
Yes the mc32 has more channels, and a couple more controls as well(3 sliders in between the sticks). Fwiw I think I needed 14 channels for the 944, due to the split boom, two aux hydraulic ports, and lights. On the HOTT stuff you can get a multiswitch module which allows 1 channel to control 4/8 functions(reduced resolution, and response... Good for secondary functions)... Which might eliminate the need to go beyond the mc20.
I think other radios have similar functions to the model match... Jeti may have model match... with Graupner hott, you have to turn the model off, select a new model in the tx, turn the new model on... So you can still run two models, just a little bit more involved to switch between them. It's not a huge problem for me as I run the excavator on the MC32 and the rest of the gear on spektrum. If I ever get a second excavator, I will use the mc32, and accept the pain... I wouldn't be switching that much between the two machines... Cheers, AP Last edited by apfubar; 10-23-2014 at 04:37 PM. Reason: Wombats r us |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: DX10 or MC20
Quote:
The Spektrum is looking like the better radio for me at the moment I would say |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|