![]() |
|
Construction Equipment Tech Hydraulics, Electronics, General Engineering, ect in constr equip |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to work my way out of the business I am in and start doing more hobby stuff for others utilizing what I have to work with. Naturally, 1:16, 1:14 and 1:12 are much smaller and more difficult to work with the physics of the engine, that is another reason I went with 1:8. Like they say, the bigger they are, the more room you need and the heavier they get for mobilization.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am trying to load pictures of the undercarriage progress. Will it work??
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is another one! There must be a better way. I seem to hold my own in the shop stuff but, have more trouble with all my files??...the triple grouser will not be tall as in this sample (steel profile), I have thicken up the horizontal cross section since it is alum. for strength. The other two profiles have already been done.
Last edited by catmack; 02-24-2013 at 10:25 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think these are enough to get the idea. Can take more if one wants.
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|